Each review has a clear scope. The evidence and the decision are recorded, including what the seal does and does not mean.
A licence, a government standard, and a temple's own decision each cover something we do not. What we add is the scriptural question, alongside records and responsible practice.
The weight given to each one depends on the product category and the claims being made.
01
The pack and records must identify the maker or packer, ingredients or materials, quantity, and applicable licences. Contract manufacturing is acceptable when it is disclosed honestly.
02
The review uses representative samples and checks that fit the product category. Where laboratory testing is needed, the lab must have the right recognised scope.
03
When a product makes a sacred claim, council members examine its intended use, ingredients, method, and stated tradition against named texts and relevant practice.
04
We review worker safety, pay practices, artisan relationships, sourcing, and packaging against published criteria. A claim is accepted only when evidence supports it.
The exact documents, tests, and site checks depend on the product category and the claims being made.
We review business details, labels, licences, ingredients, suppliers, and the product's intended use.
Representative samples go through the checks that fit their product category and claims.
The council reviews scriptural context and records the reason for its decision.
When needed, a site review takes place before the final scope and renewal date are set.
The named product passed the published Shastra Life review within its stated scope and renewal date. It is not government approval, not universal temple approval, and not a promise that every future batch is risk free.
Certification applies to a named product, formulation, and manufacturing site for a stated period. Changes may need a new review. Failed checks or misleading claims may lead to suspension or withdrawal.
Tell us what you make, who makes it, and which claims you want us to review.
